当前位置: 首页 > 考题回顾与预测

2025年5月17日雅思阅读回顾

时间: 2025-07-17 15:24 来源: 朗阁小编 作者: 朗阁小编

P1 SWEET TROUBLE

  P2 生物电

  P3 音乐对人的影响



老师点评


  1. 本场考试整体难度较难。

  第一篇和第三篇的题型一致,都考察了配对、单选和判断,打破了近几场考试连续填空+判断的第一篇组合模式。

  填空题的比重出现明显减少:相比3-5月已考的场次,本场考试填空题大幅下降。

  话题方面,第一篇考察澳洲sugar生产的问题,比较贴近生活,第二篇生物电专业性稍强,科技类文章增加了难度,第三篇音乐对人的疗愈作用,此类话题剑桥真题较多,比较熟悉。

  2. 整体分析:社会类(P1),科技类(P2)和艺术科学类(P3)。

  Passage 1:SWEET TROUBLE

  题型:配对(4个)+单选题(4个)+判断题(5个)

  参考答案:

  参考答案配对题(特殊词)

  1.B

  2.F

  3.C

  4.A

  单选题

  5. D

  6. B

  7. D

  8.B

  判断

  9.T

  10.NG

  11.F

  12.NG

  13.F

  具体文章和题目待确认

  READING PASSAGE 1 Sweet Trouble

  Problems in the Australian sugar industry The Australian town of Mossman in  the state of Queensland sits in a tropical landscape between the rainforest and  the Great Barrier Reef. Eco-tourism is important there; more than 80% of Douglas  Shire, of which Mossman is the administrative centre, is protected by World  Heritage listing. But for most of the town’s history, forest and reef have been  largely irrelevant: since the sugar mill was built in 1894, the town has relied  on sugarcane. Now Mossman is holding its breath. For two years the mill used by  all the farms has been close to bankruptcy. It is at the centre of the economic  shocks that have shaken Australia’s sugar industry, and for lifetime farmers and  a long list of cane industry workers a way of life will disappear if the mill  closes. Mossman has roughly 160 growers, who now produce less than one million  of the nation’s annual cane harvest of 30–40 million tonnes. But it is a  microcosm of the industry. All across Australia, the cane-growing business is  being squeezed between the pincers of economics and the environment.

  The ten-year average return to sugar growers throughout the 1990s was about  $350 a tonne. In early 2004, sugar prices plummeted, resulting in a 25-year-low  average of around $232 a tonne. Although figures vary widely across farms and  regions, that was about what it cost to grow a tonne of sugar in Australia. To  forestall social and economic disaster, the Government offered more than $400  million to encourage growers to leave the industry. By the end of the year, 274  farmers had taken up the offer to leave, but another 1,000 are thought to be  seriously considering it, allowing those remaining to buy the vacated land and  improve their economies of scale.

  Fourth-generation Mossman grower Bill Phillips-Turner is one who plans to  fight on. ‘The consequences of losing the mill would be catastrophic,’ Bill  says. ‘Sugar has a big economic multiplier effect: for every dollar generated  from sugar, an additional $7 is generated in the wider community. Because of  limited options around here, most people now employed by the industry would have  to leave the area to find work.’ The farmer-shareholders have so far saved the  mill by accepting substantial cuts to cane payments, but this has come at a big  cost to everyone. As chairman of the board of the mill, Bill has presided over  tough and unpopular decisions: he has had to sack staff, cut working hours and  reduce the workforce. Assets were sold and management was outsourced. They have  also worked hard to find new ways of doing business. Ethanol production, using  sugar-based fuel, has potential, and co-generation, using cane waste to produce  fuel, power, or generate electricity, is another possibility. However, the most  preferred alternative is to create a future for the mill as a food factory,  turning out quality sugar-based foods.

  In addition to the economic struggle, there is the environmental one. The  sugar industry has the reputation of being environmentally damaging, but it has  some surprising supporters. Douglas Shire mayor, Mike Berwick, is a well-known  environmentalist, and might be expected to be anti-cane. ‘There’s no question of  the past damage it’s done to the reef through chemical and nutrient run-off,’ he  says. ‘But there’s a formula for sustainable cane production and Mossman has  nearly reached it.’ Another surprise endorsement for cane comes from the  Queensland Environmental Protection Agency’s sugar liaison officer, Karen Benn.  ‘I’m less worried about the effect of cane on the environment than I am about  other agriculture,’ she says. ‘There are good growers everywhere, but at Mossman  they seem to have taken up the challenges faster.’ For example, sediment  run-off, previously one of the main environmental problems caused by cane  growing, is now nothing like it once was, according to Dr Brian Roberts,  co-ordinator of the Douglas Shire Water Quality Improvement Program. ‘North  Queensland used to hold the record for soil loss,’ he says. ‘Now ... cane  country is accumulating soil.’ However, these improvements have been achieved at  a great cost to growers. Now in his 60s, Tom Watters has spent a lifetime on the  same farm. Fourteen years ago, he was alerted to the fact his cane could be  having an impact on the waterway on Mackay Creek, the narrow waterway that  receives all his run-off, and so Tom planted a 5,000-tree buffer along the edge  of the creek with rocks to prevent erosion, and began exploring methods that  cause minimal soil disturbance. However, none of these costly initiatives has  helped him get better cane prices. As his neighbour, Doug Cress, comments that  ‘Economically, the [cane growing] doesn’t make much sense. But there’s more to  life than money. It’s this addiction to the way of life that keeps many cane  farmers growing an under-performing crop. “It’s a good lifestyle,” Doug says. “I  spend eight months working on the farm and four months working with our kids  while my wife works in town. I’ve been looking at alternative crops, like  forestry and cocoa, and it turns out that working away from the farm is the best  diversification we could do. However, I still don’t want to do that.”’

  It is difficult to see how anyone can deal satisfactorily with the passing  of a way of life. Cane farmers have been part of eastern Queensland for more  than a century. But, despite the efforts they have put into fighting the good  environmental fight, there is no guarantee that the new way of life evolving  there will include cane.

  Questions 1–4

  Look at the following statements (Questions 1–4) and the list of people  below. Match each statement with the correct person, A–F. Write the correct  letter, A–F, in boxes 1–4 on your answer sheet.

  List of people

  A. Bill Phillips - Turner B.Mike Berwick C.Karen Bono D.Brian Roberts E.Tom  Watters F. Doug Crees

  1. Mossman cane farming practices are close to an environmentally friendly  model. 2.Financial return is not the only important factor for cane growers.

  2. Cane sugar may not harm the environment as much as other crops do.

  3. The local population would decline if the sugar-processing plant  closed.

  Questions 5–8 Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D. Write the correct  letter in boxes 5–8 on your answer sheet.

  4. In the first paragraph, the writer says that the town is 'holding its  breath' because

  A. it has environmental problems. B. its tourism business is  threatened.

  B. most of its people have left the town. D. a key processing plant may  shut down. 6.According to the writer, cane growers who refuse the government  offer are expected to

  A. expand their farms. B. sell their land at a low price.

  B. find jobs in other industries. D. seek financial help from banks.

  8. Which of the following did Bill Phillips-Turner find most difficult to  do?

  A. sell mill property B. reduce spending on upkeep

  B. lower mill workers’ wages D. cut the number of mill staff

  9. Cane grower Doug Cress says that he

  A. would prefer to grow cocoa. B. wants to remain on his farm.

  B. wants his family to live together. D. will look for part-time work in  town. Questions 9–13 Do the following statements agree with the information  given in Reading Passage 1? In boxes 9–13 on your answer sheet, write TRUE if  the statement agrees with the information FALSE if the statement contradicts the  information NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

  10. In 2004, the cost of producing sugar in Australia was similar to the  selling price. 10.Farmers who accepted the Government offer have mostly moved to  the city.

  11. Fuel production is regarded as the most desirable alternative business  for the sugar mill.

  12. Tom Watters reduced his use of pesticides.

  13.Environmentally friendly farming practices have been profitable for Tom  Watters.

  Passage 2:生物电

  题型:待确认

  Passage 3:音乐对人的影响

  题型:判断+单选+配对

  具体文章和题目待确认



考试建议


1. 5月后期的考试,第一篇文章继续保证填空+判断题型的稳定组合的熟练应对,同时注意延续本场考试配对选择组合的第一篇开局。第二篇和第三篇加强对list  of headings的练习,以及特殊词配对、段落信息配对。形成相对固定的全文答题顺序和策略。

2. 下场考试的话题可能有历史类,科技类,环境类。

3. 重点浏览2018到2023年机经。


(责任编辑:朗阁小编)

文中图片素材来源网络,如有侵权请联系删除

相关课程推荐

相关文章推荐